Wednesday, January 28, 2026

Pavel Dybenko and the Sailors Quest during Revolutionary Russia Chapter One -Gestation


    In search of a cooperative commonwealth!

The Rise and Fall of the Russian Revolutionary Sailors 
and Their Leader...
Pavel Efimovich Dybenko.


For all our loved ones whom we miss.

The following attempts to ensure historical justice for Pavel Dybenko, the sailors, and the Russian people, who considered the Great October Revolution truly the "dawn of a new era." 
Distancing themselves from the notion that by supporting the Great October Revolution, one supported Lenin.

Chapter One: Gestation

A time of troubles and upheavals
Russians in the grip of the Romanov dynasty


In 1905–1907, a wave of mutinies rocked naval bases in the Baltic, Black Sea, and Far East, involving the crews of 22 ships and more than 20,000 sailors.


From 1906 to 1915,
5,757 sailors were convicted of plotting mutinies.
Among them:
169 were executed by hanging,
1,032 were exiled to hard labor,
1,744 were imprisoned in various correctional facilities for varying terms,
20 were locked up in fortresses,
876 were imprisoned in a naval prison, and others were exiled and sent to civilian prisons with various types of punishment.


One life, one kopeck.

In the first months of 1905... Uprisings in the Baltics, Baku, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other regions shook the Tsarist regime to its foundations. Even some of the Tsar's most trusted officials breathlessly admit that the Tsar has lost his way. Dissent is not limited to workers, peasants, and others... but also to the Tsar's most loyal subjects... the highest officials in his government.


January 22, 1905


Tsar Nicholas II's uncle, Grand Duke Vladimir, holds the post of military commandant in the St. Petersburg district.


Russian Grand Duke Vladimir


It was he who commanded the troops on the day that later became infamous as "Red Sunday"...
Thousands of unarmed Russian citizens: men, women, children... led by Father Gapon, marched to the Winter Palace to present a petition to the Tsar... all of them were like-minded in the glorious and fiery phrase:
"Russia must and will be free."


The restless Tsar Nicholas II

May 1905

An article appeared in the Quarterly Review, and then another in National Review, titled simply "The Tsar"...
Parts of both articles quote the testimony of someone who knew the Tsar closely, presenting the views of his close associate, who reveals what many Russians already knew:
"the sun of Romanov rule was beginning to set."

July 1905



The rebels tell the story of the uprising on the Black Sea, the uprising took place on the battleship Prince Potemkin-Tavrichesky, the leader of the uprising was Matyushenko, according to the Parisian magazine Le Journal.

Conversation with Matyushenko

"You mad creature," Pogovnets interrupted him, "you've forgotten that on July 5th, the entire fleet's crews were supposed to mutiny. The order hadn't been given to everyone yet. You started too early. They won't support us."


In 1905...sailors of the Tsarist fleet issued a statement;

"Revolutionary Manifesto"

"Comrades, do not lose heart! Not all is lost. The rotten tsarist government has not crushed everything in our fleet.
There are still people who honorably bear the glorious banner of social justice.
Do not lose heart, comrade sailors!
Do not lose courage, be bold. Do not lose courage and with all the strength and might of which you are capable, continue your great struggle for our noble cause - the liberation of the people from the yoke of tsarism! Let us be like tempered steel... Let our hearts feel neither mercy nor pity for our worst enemies in this struggle... A knee on the chest and a hand on the throat - let this be our motto!

Friends sailors, this time we were unable to prevent the Russian government from arresting our comrades, but we must avenge them. The Russian tsar will again be washed in the blood of the people, but the cause of freedom will not die.
No! Life itself is on our side. It pushes us to fight against autocracy.

No tsar can contain or control the raging ocean of popular anger. The time is not far off when, in a liberated Russia...free from tsarism...the sailors will engage in their final battle...a battle against the tsarist social order and move toward a healthy cooperative commonwealth.

July 1905.


Professor Reisner of the University of Berlin, a native of Russia, asserts that the naval mutinies were caused not by poor food, but by the revolutionary agitation that had been going on in the navy for years. According to the professor, the sailors cannot be classified as mutineers and murderers, but rather as heroes willing to sacrifice their lives for their country.
Professor Reisner added:
"The greatest mistake of the Russian government was that it turned the army into a political party supporting absolutism against the will of the people."


St. Petersburg July 1905

The Rotten System in the Navy. "Fear," says the Captain, "is the only basis for discipline in the army and navy, and it will prove as poor a tool for maintaining the loyalty of rank-and-file soldiers to the throne as it is for suppressing discontent among the people. The government must learn the lesson that the soldiers and sailors are beginning to awaken, just as the people have awakened.  





Revel July 1905. 

Fearing a new rebellion, the authorities of Revel ordered the confiscation of weapons of the sailors on the cruisers Minin and Kremlin.
cruisers "Minin"


cruisers "Kremlin"

The official version cites serious discontent among some warship crews over the quality of food supplies.

The officer responsible for this situation was arrested.

August 1905.


The sailors of Kronstadt revolt!
At night, residents of St. Petersburg could see a bright light emanating from Kotlin Island.
"The skies reflected the glow of smoldering fires."

September 1905.


The sailors were punished...sent to the Far East.
A thousand sailors who participated in the uprisings in Libau and the Black Sea were transferred to the occupation army in the Far East.

October 1905.
Another senseless act of cruelty occurred.
A march of many Russian citizens—workers, students, women, and children—was demonstrating in memory of January 22, or Bloody Sunday.

Without warning, Colonel Min brutally and mercilessly shot the demonstrators and threatened to burn down the Technological University with the students inside.

November 1905.
The sailors of Sevastopol have rebelled!


The latest reports from Sevastopol indicate that the mutineers forced the officers and crew of the cruiser Ochakov to abandon ship. The crews of the battleships Rostislav and Tris in Sulataly are known not to have mutinied. However, one reserve battalion joined the mutineers. Several companies of the Vlinsky Regiment arrived in Sevastopol from Feodosia.

The Sevastopol Uprising (November 1905), led by Lieutenant Schmidt, was an armed rebellion of Black Sea Fleet sailors and soldiers of the Sevastopol garrison, dock workers, and the Marine Plant.
The uprising was suppressed, and for his role in the putsch, Lieutenant Schmidt was executed on March 6, 1906, on Berezan Island.
Lieutenant Schmidt Petr Petrovich

Vladivostok. November 1905.


A tragic incident occurred at the camp on Cape Churkin, where an officer who struck a sailor with a sabre because the latter did not salute him... was pursued by his fellow sailors to the officers' club... Hand-to-hand combat ensued, resulting in the death of four officers...


December 1905/January 1906.


Barricades on Presnya, 1905. Black-and-white photograph of a painting [preliminary sketch?] by Ivan Vladimirov (ru: Vladimirov Ivan Alekseevich, 1870–1947), depicting the December 1905 uprising in the Presnensky district of Moscow. Collection of the Moscow Museum of Contemporary History (former Museum of the Revolution).

Odessa. April 1906.

Death to Lieutenant Schmidt and the rebel allies


Memorial service for Lieutenant Schmidt and his comrades
In memory of Lieutenant Schmidt.


Lieutenant Schmidt led the largest and most organized uprising to date.
Although this uprising was suppressed that same November, it demonstrated to the tsar and his naval leadership that they faced a very serious task. Following the uprising, 1,611 sailors were arrested, 11 were executed, including Lieutenant Schmidt, 107 were exiled to hard labor, and 226 were placed in various correctional facilities for varying terms. Of these, 18 were sent to a disciplinary battalion, and 25 were imprisoned.


Sevastopol. July 1906.

Admiral Skrydlov

Admiral Skrydlov shares the fleet is threatening more rebellion.
It is expected today, 2,500 sailors from all the warships will present a draft addressing certain economic demands. 

Moscow January/August 1906

Former Colonel, now General Min... several months earlier, ordered the merciless murder of many residents of St. Petersburg who had participated in an honorary procession in honor of those who had called upon the Tsar for a better Russia. General Min would now deal with the so-called freedom fighters in Moscow. Having agreed to pardon... General Min would mercifully hang thousands of surrendered rebels at the entrances to Moscow... he did just that... so that everyone could see the wisdom of what happens when someone raises a fist against the Tsar!

General Min

St. Petersburg. August 1906. Arrests are on the rise. Repression in Russia is becoming increasingly brutal. Key members of all trade unions are in custody.Leading members of all trade unions worked among the Kronstadt sailors. Female university students were among those detained during the mutiny.

Zinaida Konoplyannikova

On August 26, 1906... she was brought to trial for the murder of General Min, the leader of punitive actions and atrocities committed against rebellious Russian citizens during and after the Moscow uprising of 1905-6.

Zinaida Vasilievna argued in front of her judges that in order to challenge the power of the Romanov rule and destroy the existing social structure and its dominant absolutism, an armed force would be required. 

"I see clearly that the autocratic and bureaucratic superstructure rests on the armed force of the government and is able to maintain itself only through the constant practice of bloody terror on the part of those who steer our ship of state. And life itself has taught me this: you cannot create anything new without first destroying the old; if you cannot pierce an idea with a bayonet, you cannot resist the force of the bayonet by relying only on an idea."


The hope of Russia was placed within the will of the sailors.

Even President Wilson acknowledged:
Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States

“Revolutions do not happen overnight; 
revolutions accumulate over centuries; 
revolutions happen because of the long suppression of the human spirit; 
revolutions happen because people know they have rights 
and that they have been cast aside.”

Revel. August 1906. 


The sailors of the "Memory of Azov" revolt!

Revel. August 1906. 


The execution of seventeen sailors who participated in the uprising on the steamship "Memory of Azov" and their final refuge in the waters of the Baltic Sea.

The sailors write a plea,

WHERE ARE YOU, TSAR?

Corpses wander in the depths of the sea.
The splashing green waves carry them, their hands clasped tightly behind their backs.
Their faces are covered in salty, tarry sackcloth. Their
uniforms are stained with black blood.
These are the sailors of Kronstadt.
Their hearts are pierced by soldiers' bullets, and the commander ordered them thrown into the water.
In the gray fog, the shoreline is visible, its outlines painted against the dark sky, and there, above the water, rests the beautiful royal palace of Peterhof.

Where are you, Tsar?
Come out to us from behind your stern guards, see these bloody wounds that have appeared on our chests!
Cease your fear, you are our "father," and we are "your faithful children..."
We asked you for bread, and you gave us lead; parental affection was a whip for us.

October 1906

The Russian elite seek changes in governance.
Count Witte authors 
"The October Tsarist Manifesto of the Tsar"

Count Sergei Yulyevich Witte

Grand Duke Nicholas was quoted as saying, "that he would present the document to the Tsar, if the Tsar refused to sign, the Grand Duke would shoot himself in the presence of the Tsar".

Grand Duke Nikolay Nicholivitch


Odessa. August 1907.

Tsar Nicholas II is furious! He fears a new rebellion! An urgent inspection of the entire Russian fleet and fortresses has been ordered!


Tsar Nikolai Alexandrovich Romanov II


Saint Petersburg, 1907

The authorities began to perceive the navy as a kind of powder keg under the very foundations of Russian statehood.
Defense Minister Roediger remarked: "Currently, the navy is not an element of strength, but rather a threat to the state. National security requires its elimination…"

Russian Defense Minister Alexander Roediger


We leave the story here, noting in the second chapter the sailor's of the Tsar's fleet embolden themselves and begin the decade long struggle toward 1917.

Thursday, June 25, 2020

Pavel Dybenko's "Decree on the Democritization of the Navy of the Russian Republic" January 1918

                           

The following is part of a continued effort to provide interested historians 
and others who enjoy historical minutia; 
an alternative understanding of matters regarding 
Pavel Dybenko. 


Pavel Dybenko's legacy, bestowed upon the public by the likes of Lenin and Trotsky, prohibits him from taking his place among histories lot of fighters for freedom.  In the year 1917, the sailors decades long experience of torment had come to an end.  The roguish actions of the officers of the Imperial Russian Navy had formulated a combustible setting.  Sailors of the Imperial Fleet were treated no better than the convict serving a sentence of hard labor.  Conditions of the Russian sailors were first shared with the Petrograd elite in B. Roustam Bek's writing "Panama de la Marine Russe"  published in 1908.   Having fashioned great scandal...the books circulation was unquestionably prohibited.  The writing not only shared the maltreatment of the sailors by the officers but it had also eerily prophesied the inevitability that these sailors would accomplish the most important part in the struggle for liberty.  That the sailors would be uncompromising revolutionists because they had endured real slavery and knew very well what the rule of the current elite meant.  

It was held in many a Russian heart and must never be forgotten that the revolutionary victories in the year 1917... was due chiefly to the activity, firmness and self sacrifice of the members/sailors of the Tsar's Baltic Fleet.  

The following Decree authored by Dybenko was first published in No. 6 of the Gazette of the Temporary Workers and Peasants Government on January 12, 1918.  
Dybenko demonstrates, in writing, his intentions and views calling for dignity and freedoms.  
Quite conflicting with the plans Lenin has for Russia and her citizens.   Additionally, Dybenko in paragraph 51 declares the fleets continued independence from the political vanguard.  Lenin reacts, demanding paragraph 51 be rewritten.  Lenin threatens to take off the table the Naval Boards request for its Ministry and education for its servicemen.   

An excerpt: 
                         Decree on the Democritization of the Navy of the Russian Republic 

                                                      On the Democritization of the Navy 
                                      Part 1-General regulation on the personnel of the Fleet

1)  The personnel of the Fleet of the Russian Republic consists of free citizens, enjoying equal civic rights. 
2) The designation by title, which has existed until now, and which expressed class distinction, are abolished, and all sailors of the Navy are to be called:
                                "Sailors of the Naval Fleet of the Russian Republic"
3) From the sailors of the Fleet of the Russian Republic there will be apportioned the commanding personnel, superintending the tactical and technical sections, working in conjunction with the committees for the management of the administrative section of the Navy. 
4) The political section is entirely in the administration of elected committees.
5) The commanding personnel is formed of persons, who are accepted into the service and performing this service in accordance with special rules expounded in Part 5. 
6) From persons not of the commanding personnel, on accordance with rules in Part 5, they are nominated according to their specialties foremen who are responsible aids of the specialists of the commanding personnel. 
7) All sailors have designations, answering to their specialties and position occupied:
For example, Commander, Mechanic, Artilleryman, Electrician, etc.
8) All titles are revoked and persons occupying positions of command, are designated by their duties, for example,--Citizen Commander, Citizen Mechanics, etc. 
9) A new style of clothing, general for all naval sailors, is to be designed by a separate, special commission.
10) All sailors of the Navy are granted the right to wear civilian clothing off duty.
11) All sailors of the Navy have the right to be members of any political, national, religious, economic or professional organization, society or union.  They have the right, freely and openly, to express and profess by word of mouth, in writing or in print, their political, religious and other views.
12) All sailors of the Navy are subject to the laws, general for all citizens, without any exceptions.  Correspondence must be delivered to the addressee without exception.
13) All sailors, not on duty, have the right to absent themselves from their vessels and sections in accordance with orders and rules, established by corresponding organizations, but on the condition that a sufficient number of persons must remain to serve the vessel or section.
14) The commanding personnel have separate accommodations for living and for work, on board ship and at shore-stations.
15) The commanding personnel are allowed servants who hire out at their own free will, at the expense of the person desiring to have same, or in time of war, by the appointment of orderlies, on a mutual (with the crew) agreement, and with a definite salary.


Paragraph 51
51) Instructions to vessels, detachments, and the fleet on operative and technical questions are issued by corresponding persons of the commanding personnel, on economic and administrative questions by the commanding personnel, together with the committee and on political questions by the committees: semaphore messages received and sent.
Note--All orders of the central organs of the naval administration as well as the general state, and also ordinances of any committees published for general information are subject to execution in the fleet and flotillas of the Navy only in the event of their confirmation by the Central Committee of the Sea through instructions published in accordance with No. 20 and the foot note. 
      

Without hesitation Lenin authors a draft 
Draft Decision for the Council of People's Commissars on...
The Order of Subordination of the Baltic and Black Sea Fleets(1)

Considering the wording of the note #51. to be inexact or based on a misunderstanding, since the text, if taken literally, implies a refusal to recognize the supremacy of the Soviet state authority(2), the C.P.C asks the Navy's legislative organ to revise the wording of this note.

The C.P.C. takes into consideration the statement by representatives of the Navy that the note in question in no way signifies any repudiation of the central Soviet authorities, and instructs comrades Proshian and Lunacharsky to draw up on behalf of the Council of People's Commissars a well reasoned memorandum to the legislative organ of the Navy clarifying the point of view of the Council of People's Commissars.

Notes

1) This draft, written by Lenin, was endorsed at a meeting of the C.P.C. on January 15(28), 1918.

2) This refers to paragraph 51 of the "Regulations for the Democritization of the Navy" endorsed by an order of the Supreme Naval Board on January 8 (21), 1918.  It stated that "all orders of the central bodies, both those of the naval department and the state authorities, as well as the orders of any committees whatsoever...shall be fulfilled in the fleet or sea flotillas only if confirmed by the Central Committee of the Navy..."

Central Party Achives of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism of the C.C. of the C.P.S.U.

Lenin also requests that People's Commissar Dybenko send his deputy for the meeting of the Smaller Soviet of the People's Commissars that will take place at Smolny Palace at the Red Hall on January 18th at 6PM or in case he fails to do so paragraph 8920 can be taken off the meetings agenda.

Agenda
Of the meeting of the Smaller Soviet for January 1918.
H. About granting a special credit of 250,000 rubles for the sailors' educational needs (Dybenko)
I. Solicitation of the Supreme Naval Board to allow the credits for the Naval Ministry
(Dybenko) 

Dybenko holding on to the fruits of October...Lenin moving to destroy them.



Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Pavel Dybenko: Lenin’s February 23rd is fabrication!


Why “Lenin’s version” regarding the events of February 23rd holds no water.

In previous writings I have attempted to illuminate the struggles between Pavel Dybenko and Lenin.
I have been met with indifference at best frowned upon at worst.
Seems contemporary historians such as Suvorov, who writes without citation, and Archdeacon Kuraev continue to espouse Lenin’s historical account.  Or worse yet, Dr. Zubov’s steadfast belief, although incorrect, in the often illuminated abuse of spirits by the sailors.
Oh that rascal Dybenko!
American writer Louise Bryant (witness of events in 1917) shared a contradictory picture of the morality the sailors under Dybenko held themselves.  And it wasn’t just Bryant, a number of intellectuals, politicos, sailors, Generals and Admirals all have written about Dybenko as being keen witted, respectful, and one whose character demonstrated strength and courage.
When reflecting upon the events of 1917 one can not dismiss the decades long pursuits or historical actions taken by the Tsars sailors on behalf of the Russian citizenry.
In 1917, largely due to the armed might of the sailors a Tsar would abdicate his throne.  As spring came to Russia, the sailors organized under Pavel Dybenko’s leadership so as “the sailors one voice could be heard by the government.”
Dybenko’s leadership did not buckle under the attempts by the Kerensky led government to subordinate the sailors to the latter’s authoritarian desire.  In fact this refusal by Dybenko to neuter the sailors lawful organization Tsentrobalt would be the creation of conflict between Dybenko and Kerensky.
Lenin openly declared his successful insurrection would be impossible without the support of the Baltic fleet!
Often historians share Dybenko was a Bolshevik and therefore the sailors were nothing more than fanatics of Lenin’s designs.  Yet how did the sailors go from a decades long confrontation with the Tsar culminating in abdication and declaring the replacing government ineffectual to supporting a non democratic leader such as Lenin?
How does the “Soul of the Baltic Fleet” go from a highly respected hero to coward and drunkard?
Lenin largely rode the path to power on Dybenko and the sailors determination.
Controlling this “armed fist” was imperative for whomever would lead Russia.  Lenin wanted to be ruler Dybenko had to go!

There were numerous signs...
Kerensky declaring to General Krasnov that Dybenko was his enemy meaning the enemy of the existing governmental structure.
The Dybenko Cossack accord agreeing to Lenin and Trotsky’s removal from government.
Lenin, according to Podvoisky, wanted Dybenko to face a Military Tribunal immediately.  Such a move was premature...in due time.
Dybenko receives more votes than Lenin cast for representation to the Constituent Assembly.
Later in November, at the Sailors All Russian Conference, Lenin is witness to the devotion and admiration the sailors, the armed fist, had for Dybenko.
The writers of the times also spoke to Dybenko as the hero of the revolution...that of course had to change!
The year 1918 comes to pass, the harvest that was supposedly “October” would slowly fade away.
The disparaging of Pavel Dybenko commences!
Dybenko will be promoted to an uneducated buffoon who without Kollontai couldn’t write a coherent sentence...a drunkard with a faulty compass... an unreliable loose cannon!
Contradicting everything known about Dybenko.

Lenin reacts bitterly by decreeing if Dybenko’s “Democratization of the Fleet” is not changed due mainly to the fleets maintaining its independence from government, he would disallow funding for the Naval Ministry and educational programs for the sailors.
The fleet must be subordinate.

The assassination of two former Provisional Government Ministers blamed on the sailors although Dybenko authored a published condemnation and its was widely held that the so called assassins came directly from Dzerzhinsky’s offices.

Lenin’s refusal to allow Dybenko to speak during the government’s discussions on the Treaty of Brest Litovsk.

Dybenko’s public opposition to the Treaty and his view points as part of a group of intellectuals who wrote in dissent of Lenin’s stance in the gazette “The Kommunist”.

To ensure that Dybenko and the revolutionary mindset of the sailors would be destroyed one only
has to look closely at the negotiations of the Treaty and its affect on the Russian Navy.

Plenty of news accounts setting the table for Dybenko and his followers to be looked at as anarchists and against Lenin’s wishes.

Which brings us to Lenin’s coup de grace...the nonsense that becomes the “written word” of the events of February 23rd.

The first fact one has to consider when supporting Lenin’s version is the historical written word of Bonch Bruyevitch after having viewed the sailors detachment being sent to Narva “Not impressed”and “rag tag bunch”.   What Bonch-Bruyevitch, Lenin and subscribing historians don’t share is that this very group led by Dybenko were none other that the heroic sailors of the Northern Flying Squad sent in December to defend the newly formed Soviet regime in battle at Orenburg against Ataman Dutov.  Heroic deeds preserved in memorial by monument at the Field of Mars.  Even it’s leader, Pavlov, was among those sailors who appeared with Dybenko.

Lenin and supporting historian’s don’t share that commander P M Bulkin’s retreating detachment from Revel joined Dybenko’s men.  That headquarters according to Pavlov failed to adequately supply detachment with artillery or men...

Narva would be lost giving Lenin and Trotsky the reason to completely control the military and more specifically the fleet.

At first government publications decried Dybenko would be arrested for his opposition to the Treaty of Brest Litovsk, then for Dybenko’s haphazard retreat from Narva, then added to Protocol 82...Krylenko’s indictment against Dybenko: drunkenness and terror!

Of course first Minister of Justice Shteinberg who would go on to defend Dybenko at his upcoming trial without hesitation stated Dybenko’s arrest and subsequent trial had nothing to do with the events of Narva!  Political differences with those in power were the real reasons.

Cui Bono?
Lenin ruled Russia...Trotsky goes on to rule the military and Dybenko is unceremoniously removed from government and the consciousness of Dybenko and the sailors would forever be swept under the rug of historical significance.

Until now.....

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Where have you gone Pavel Dybenko?

Today, in the U.S., workers have no seat, no say nor representation at the table regarding the machinations of business.  The business communities assault on workers for the last forty plus years has broken the will of many men and women.  There are others who (against their own interest) advocate during conversation, "to alter the existing economic system would be disastrous for all".
By accepting the current economic structure (the distribution of wealth) suggest to the ruling classes the american worker is willing to suffer ever more.  Which leaves little doubt further abuses, much harsher than exists now, will be "sold" as expanded and "beneficial" to whatever plan is in place.

Welcome to America in the winter of 2020!  Where the stock market is hitting new heights and where workers are not sharing in on the great economic success so often touted.

Unfortunately, Francois Babeuf was quite clear when he spoke to bending tolerance beyond reproach.  Continuing to send individuals to congress who won't even argue Workers should have representation in all trade agreements is disastrous for the working classes.  We are their constituents, not the donor classes!  The will of the workers can and should be spoken now...without hesitation!
By advancing the current economic climate...the inevitable outcome should well be avoided.

I often hear (via internet, tv, radio) various collective views or discussions on the topics of secession or revolution.  Most often by groups who feel disconnected, apart from the current conversation of the American fabric.  From far left idealism's to far right...the thread that combines all these groups who suffer from perceived grievances are economic and lack of opportunity.  The past 40 plus year program to dissociate and disregard labor demonstrates well demonstrates as to the planned lack of future for many. As Alan Greenspan referred to in 1997,
             "Suppressed wage-cost growth as a consequence of job insecurity can be carried only so far.  At some point in the future, the trade off of subdued wage growth for job security has to come to an end."

That was more than twenty years ago, One's future is set in the path of ones' past.

For instance,

When one has no seat at the table--it is if (workers) don't exist.  To have no opportunity to deliberate for wages, pensions and other necessary benefits and protections...indicates a marginalization of the entire working class.  Yet...our labor laws are enshrined with ethnic based or identity based idealism that is inherently in violation of our constitution.  Many view this "lawful" protection of the so called minorities only works to separate the workers.
The "protected" classes in the labor laws should well be comprised of "all" the workers.  That is the distinction!...Labor vs Management, the age old agitation. 

As I write this I pray the ruling classes pull it together and allow for labor to take a seat at the table of business...greed knows no bounds.  The continued path of disingenuous and neglectful arrogance toward the working classes results in no positive outcome.

Pavel Dybenko once said,
                         "It is better to die for freedoms and dignity rather than to live without them"

I cringe to even think about those who call for revolution...the amount of bloodshed resulting from such activity is a horrific reality that most can not envision.  I call on all wise men to use discussion, deliberation and compromise, fine American qualities, in charting out a path for a fairer distribution of wealth that benefits all.  A process that denies men like Pavel Dybenko from appearing.  Men whose plight would be to lead the disenfranchised to forcefully convince the ruling classes to submit to a more favorable society.

Although, at the end of the day...one may ask oneself, Where have you gone Pavel Dybenko? 

The Irony of Alexandra Kollontai and Pavel Dybenko

  The Irony of Kollontai's relationship with Dybenko is difficult to overlook. A committed Bolshevik political operative entered the rev...